Welcome to People Training For Dogs(sm)


Sfu Independent Contractor Agreement

For agreements of 10,000 $US, contact your purchasing manager. 2.1 From time to time, services to the University are provided under agreements other than those provided by staff members. 2.2 Unless the university`s collective agreements restrict the provision of these services, the university may enter into these services with an independent contractor performing individual or corporate functions. 2.3 An independent contractor may have taken the form of a sole proprietorship, partnership or limited liability company and have defined a name that it uses for the activity. 2.4 An Independent Contractor Agreement (ICA) or a Service Agreement (AFS) is required. 2.5 Payment to the Contractor through the credit system is made after approval of the invoices submitted in accordance with the terms of the ICA. 2.6 If the independent contractor is not established in Canada, a T4ANR is issued and tax is withheld for non-residents, unless a waiver declaration is requested. 3.0 Payments to Employees The Payment Services Group is responsible for processing university expenses in a timely and accurate manner and strives to maintain an exceptional level of customer service for teachers, staff and students. Financial controls are exercised by our staff to ensure that all processing procedures comply with university guidelines and government rules. The SFU`s payment terms are 30 days from the date of the invoice. However, employees are paid within five business days of filing the fee bill and authorized authorization. Determination of the employment relationship Over the years, different indices have developed to determine whether a person is an employee or a self-employed person. These indices are often grouped into “tests”.

A general test is, for example, the control test. Others can be described as an integration test, an economic reality test, and a specified results test. Control In an employer/employee relationship, the employer has the right to control how the worker works. This could be compared to the situation (i.e. autonomy) in which the work to be done is controlled, but not to how it will be done. In the first case, it is the employer who determines what to do and how to do it; in the latter case, it is the employer who decides what to do, but not how to do it. The degree of control exercised (often referred to as the “control test”) can be examined on the basis of the following: Accounting of Goods and Claims (PST/GST/Non-Resident Withholding Tax) While the control test is still applicable, courts have found it difficult to rely solely on this aspect. For example, the control of the master of a ship or, perhaps more relevantly, a professional. The control test itself is often too rigid. Other criteria are the ownership of facilities and tools (e.g. B the worker provides his own facilities and tools?) as well as the chance of winning and the risk of loss (e.g.B.

the worker earns a fixed amount and generates few costs or does he entail different costs for the worker without knowing some knowledge of recovery and profit?). 2. Integration The integration test studies the role of individuals in the university and if the work done is an integral part of the university`s business, the person is a collaborator. If the work done can be separated from the university, it may indicate that the person is independent. 3. Economic reality The economic reality test studies the chances of profit (or loss) and investment in investments. . . .